What are the Differences between CNC Machining PC and Acrylic?
Machinability
Polycarbonate (PC) is more rigid and flexible than acrylic, allowing it to endure the machining process without cracking. However, this toughness can also make a PC more challenging to machine precisely as it may deform or bend, especially in thinner configurations. Special attention must be given to tool selection and cutting speed to prevent melting or warping due to heat generated during machining.
Acrylic (PMMA), while more brittle than polycarbonate, is easier to machine to a high-quality finish. It tends to chip rather than melt, allowing for a smoother cut when using sharp, adequately configured tools. Acrylic’s brittleness, however, means that it can crack or shatter if not handled carefully during the machining process, especially near edges or when drilling holes.
Finish Quality
PC generally provides a good finish but can require additional processes, such as flame polishing or sanding, to achieve the high clarity and smoothness that acrylic naturally possesses. Due to its flexibility, polycarbonate might show marks or small deformations after machining if not appropriately supported.
Acrylic offers excellent clarity and a glossy finish directly after machining, often not requiring additional finishing processes. This makes it particularly suitable for aesthetic components where a clear, glass-like appearance is desired.
Heat Tolerance
During machining, both materials generate heat, but they react differently. Polycarbonate can withstand higher temperatures before deforming, which is advantageous in more intensive machining operations. Acrylic may require careful management of machining speeds and feeds to avoid generating excessive heat that could lead to melting or burning.
Tool Wear
Machining PCs tend to cause more wear on tools due to their toughness and the need for higher force during cutting. This can increase the cost and time of machining operations as tools may need more frequent replacement or sharpening.
Acrylic, being softer, generally causes less wear on tools, which can be beneficial for longer production runs or when using delicate machining techniques.
Cost Implications
Given the differences in tool wear, heat management, and finishing requirements, PC might be more costly to machines than acrylic, especially for complex or high-precision parts. However, the choice often depends on the specific requirements of the final product, including its mechanical properties and environmental exposure.