What are the Differences between PEEK vs. Ultem Machining?
Thermal Properties
PEEK is renowned for its high heat resistance, with a continuous service temperature of up to 260°C, compared to Ultem, which has a continuous service temperature of around 180°C.
This higher thermal resistance of PEEK impacts its machinability, often requiring more careful management of cutting temperatures to prevent material degradation or distortion during machining.
Mechanical Strength
Both materials are strong, but PEEK generally offers higher tensile strength than Ultem. This difference means that PEEK can be more challenging to machine, as it may require more force to cut, leading to potential tool wear. While also robust, Ultem allows for somewhat easier machining under similar conditions due to its slightly lower strength than PEEK.
Chemical Resistance
PEEK exhibits superior chemical resistance, especially to hydrolysis, even at high temperatures. This resistance can affect the choice of coolants or lubricants during machining, as some fluids may interact with materials.
Ultem also offers excellent chemical resistance, but the superior performance of PEEK in aggressive chemical environments may necessitate different machining considerations to avoid contamination or damage.
Machining Parameters
Due to their different thermal and mechanical properties, PEEK and Ultem require distinct machining parameters. PEEK’s higher strength and thermal resistance typically demand slower feed rates and higher cutting speeds to minimize heat buildup and ensure smooth cuts.
In contrast, Ultem can be machined with slightly more aggressive feed rates due to its lower thermal resistance, allowing for faster removal rates without compromising part integrity.
Tool Wear
Machining PEEK, especially reinforced grades, can lead to increased tool wear due to its abrasive nature. Tools used for machining PEEK may require more frequent replacement or reconditioning.
While still challenging, Ultem tends to be less abrasive on tools, potentially reducing tool costs over time.
Surface Finish
Both materials can achieve excellent surface finishes with proper machining practices. However, the specific machining strategies and tool paths might differ due to the materials’ responses to machining processes. Achieving the best possible finish may require adjustments in tooling, speeds, and feeds specific to each material.
Cost Considerations
Finally, the cost of machining these materials can differ significantly. PEEK’s higher price point and potentially increased tool wear contribute to higher overall machining costs than Ultem. This cost difference should be considered when selecting materials for a project, especially for large-scale or high-volume manufacturing.